Thesis Evaluation Criteria
Degree Program in Higher Education Administration Practice Research (Correspondence Education Course)
Master's Degree (University Administration)
[Review System]
The review process consists of a total of three members: the supervising professor who serves as the main examiner, and two other faculty members who serve as co-examiners.
[Evaluation items]
・Master's thesis
1. The research topic has social significance.
2. Appropriate prior research relevant to the theme has been conducted, and related literature has been collected.
3. The research objectives, research methods, research results and discussion, and references are appropriately described.
4. It conforms to the format and style of a master's thesis based on the guidance of the academic advisor.
・Research results report
1. This is a practical and hands-on case study related to the author's own work and activities.
2. Appropriate prior research relevant to the theme has been conducted, and related literature has been collected.
3. The research objectives, research methods, research results and discussion, and references are appropriately described.
4. It conforms to the format and style of research results reports based on the guidance of the supervising professor.
[Evaluation Criteria]
・Master's thesis
The pass/fail decision will be made after a comprehensive evaluation by the chief and sub-chief based on the above evaluation items, and a final examination.
・Research results report
The pass/fail decision will be made after a comprehensive evaluation by the chief and sub-chief based on the above evaluation items, and a final examination.
[Review System]
The review process consists of a total of three members: the supervising professor who serves as the main examiner, and two other faculty members who serve as co-examiners.
[Evaluation items]
・Master's thesis
1. The research topic has social significance.
2. Appropriate prior research relevant to the theme has been conducted, and related literature has been collected.
3. The research objectives, research methods, research results and discussion, and references are appropriately described.
4. It conforms to the format and style of a master's thesis based on the guidance of the academic advisor.
・Research results report
1. This is a practical and hands-on case study related to the author's own work and activities.
2. Appropriate prior research relevant to the theme has been conducted, and related literature has been collected.
3. The research objectives, research methods, research results and discussion, and references are appropriately described.
4. It conforms to the format and style of research results reports based on the guidance of the supervising professor.
[Evaluation Criteria]
・Master's thesis
The pass/fail decision will be made after a comprehensive evaluation by the chief and sub-chief based on the above evaluation items, and a final examination.
・Research results report
The pass/fail decision will be made after a comprehensive evaluation by the chief and sub-chief based on the above evaluation items, and a final examination.